Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Shorter Romm v Kloor

Miaow.

(but am I supposed to care?)

I don't read Romm when I can avoid it. I have come across Keith Kloor's name a few times but not enough to really know what he thinks and how good he is (sorry). I see mentioned that he hadn't even read Superfreakonomics before getting embroiled in the argument, which seems a touch foolhardy to me. However he promised a week ago (28/10) that he would read it "in the next week" so assuming he's as good as his word we can all look forward to his informed commentary shortly...

4 comments:

EliRabett said...

Wanna bet

Purrr.

James Annan said...

Eli,

Be a good chap and pass the popcorn.

skanky said...

"(but am I supposed to care?)"

It's blogicism at its finest. You're only *supposed* to care if you own a blo...oh...

Hank Roberts said...

The action's also been lively for a while over at
http://www.cejournal.net variously. But

"It's a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken,
Perhaps they're better left unsung.
I don't know, don't really care ...."