Shorter Romm v Kloor
Miaow.
(but am I supposed to care?)
I don't read Romm when I can avoid it. I have come across Keith Kloor's name a few times but not enough to really know what he thinks and how good he is (sorry). I see mentioned that he hadn't even read Superfreakonomics before getting embroiled in the argument, which seems a touch foolhardy to me. However he promised a week ago (28/10) that he would read it "in the next week" so assuming he's as good as his word we can all look forward to his informed commentary shortly...
(but am I supposed to care?)
I don't read Romm when I can avoid it. I have come across Keith Kloor's name a few times but not enough to really know what he thinks and how good he is (sorry). I see mentioned that he hadn't even read Superfreakonomics before getting embroiled in the argument, which seems a touch foolhardy to me. However he promised a week ago (28/10) that he would read it "in the next week" so assuming he's as good as his word we can all look forward to his informed commentary shortly...
Labels: climate science, hype, media
posted by James Annan on Wednesday, November 04, 2009
4 Comments:
Wanna bet
Purrr.
Eli,
Be a good chap and pass the popcorn.
"(but am I supposed to care?)"
It's blogicism at its finest. You're only *supposed* to care if you own a blo...oh...
The action's also been lively for a while over at
http://www.cejournal.net variously. But
"It's a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken,
Perhaps they're better left unsung.
I don't know, don't really care ...."
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home