There's an interesting op-ed by Gary Yohe and Michael Schlesinger here.
I agree with the basic premise that we should attempt to account for uncertainty in a meaningful and consistent way in our decisions.
I disagree with their presentation of fundamentally subjective probabilistic estimates as if they are objective facts ("Our own work has shown that there is a 1 in 5 chance...")
I disagree strongly with their specific assertion of a THC collapse by 2050 with 20% probability.
Michael Schlesinger was at the workshop last week. Interesting guy, but I didn't agree with everything he said...
I agree with the basic premise that we should attempt to account for uncertainty in a meaningful and consistent way in our decisions.
I disagree with their presentation of fundamentally subjective probabilistic estimates as if they are objective facts ("Our own work has shown that there is a 1 in 5 chance...")
I disagree strongly with their specific assertion of a THC collapse by 2050 with 20% probability.
Michael Schlesinger was at the workshop last week. Interesting guy, but I didn't agree with everything he said...
No comments:
Post a Comment