Match the quotes to the quotees.
First the quotes:
1 "Actually fairly shocking," "My own preliminary appraisal would be 'guilty as charged.'"
2 "It kind of undermines the credibility of your work criticizing others' integrity when you don't conform to the basic rules of scholarship" "If I was a peer reviewer of this report and I was to observe the paragraphs they have taken, then I would be obligated to report them" "There are a lot of things in the report that rise to the level of inappropriate."
3 "The plagiarism is fairly obvious when you compare things side-by-side"
4 "wild conclusions that have nothing to do with reality."
5 "Let me say that this is one of the most reprehensible attacks on a reputable scientist that I have seen, and the so-called tsunami of accusations made in regards to climategate are nothing in compared to the attack on Wegman." "To see such a respected academic accused in this way (with the accusations so obviously baseless) is absolutely reprehensible."
And in no particular order, their sources:
A. Cornell physicist Paul Ginsparg, developer of the
Arxiv (and some anti-plagiarism tools).
B. Judith Curry, Chair, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology.
C. Ohio State's Robert Coleman, who chairs OSU's misconduct committee
D. Virginia Tech plagiarism expert Skip Garner, who heads a copying detection effort.
E. George Mason University statistician Edward Wegman, lead author of the disputed report.
Answers can be found
here and
here. Note, however, that the problems with Wegman's report
go way beyond mere plagiarism.