Saturday, July 30, 2005

Emissions Scenarios

›
One major source of uncertainty in trying to predict how the climate is likely to change in the future, is uncertainty in the future emissio...
8 comments:
Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Simulator 2

›
It's in the news now, so I think I can safely blog about this without fear of causing embarrassment: Here is today's Japan Times art...
3 comments:
Monday, July 25, 2005

The Great Tokyo Earthquake

›
Well, the long-overdue Great Tokyo Earthquake hit on Saturday afternoon. I was up a mountain so didn't feel it (apparently, the greater...
Monday, July 18, 2005

An overview of probabilistic climate prediction

›
In this post, I'm going to be exclusively discussing the problem of estimating climate sensitivity (equilibrium surface air temperature ...
5 comments:
Friday, July 15, 2005

AAAS response to Barton letters

›
Seems a bit late, given that Barton demanded responses by the 11th, but the AAAS has at last issued a statement and letter objecting to the...
Saturday, July 09, 2005

"As the science justifies"

›
The G8 agreement on climate change, clean energy and sustainable development is posted here It says: Climate change is a serious and long-t...
Friday, July 08, 2005

More on alarmism

›
I mentioned some time ago that I didn't really think there was much alarmism in the climate science debate (by which I mean a similar s...
1 comment:
Thursday, July 07, 2005

A bet with Bashkirtsev and Mashnich?

›
Some time ago, I mentioned the reluctance of Mashnich to bet on his forecast of global cooling by 2021-2026. Since that post, he got in tou...
7 comments:
Tuesday, July 05, 2005

10C? Not likely!

›
I've found myself pointing people in the direction of this RealClimate page a few times, so I thought I might as well post my own thoug...
5 comments:
Monday, July 04, 2005

"If I did get such a letter, I would become desperate"

›
The Chronicle: Daily news: 07/01/2005 -- 01 Those who think that the Barton letters are just reasonable "oversight" should have a...
4 comments: