tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post8762582097366287351..comments2024-02-15T04:42:41.606+00:00Comments on James' Empty Blog: Double visionJames Annanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-86370277714252180392012-06-25T03:24:00.805+01:002012-06-25T03:24:00.805+01:00Ah, but two identical cameras is less fun than two...Ah, but two identical cameras is less fun than two different ones...James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-48515986055344973282012-06-25T00:24:39.718+01:002012-06-25T00:24:39.718+01:00P.S., getting into stereo, you can justify owning ...P.S., getting into stereo, you can justify owning _two_ cameras:<br />http://archive.org/details/HankRobertsStereoMitziyawns<br />(Arranging a black 'canvas' twice the width of the images removes some of the visual clutter when fusing).Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-16957813890722001002012-06-24T12:35:24.720+01:002012-06-24T12:35:24.720+01:00The steps look more impressive to me.
When it wor...The steps look more impressive to me.<br /><br />When it works I see all "three" images. And I can skip between left and right and back to the "centre image" without losing the 3D effect.P. Lewishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08586624400531767627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-21944250050822502842012-06-23T18:19:06.115+01:002012-06-23T18:19:06.115+01:00yes yes YES!
And you can have great fun from high ...yes yes YES!<br />And you can have great fun from high speed aircraft, which makes the effective size of your head some thousands of feet across between one photograph and the next:<br /><br />https://secure.flickr.com/photos/wossname/3204885281/sizes/m/in/set-72157612681666970/ <br />https://secure.flickr.com/photos/wossname/2320332668/in/set-72157612681666970/lightbox/Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-46563756945953619982012-06-23T05:05:28.781+01:002012-06-23T05:05:28.781+01:00Ah, I see blogger has made them a little bit small...Ah, I see blogger has made them a little bit smaller - clicking on the pictures should get you the slightly larger originals. There's a natural upper limit of the eye distance (6.5cm) for the width of each half (since it's hard to get past parallel), and jules preferred a smaller size. Of course it also depends on the pixel density on your screen.James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-82624345414285845892012-06-23T02:50:29.482+01:002012-06-23T02:50:29.482+01:00Pretty. But why such little pictures? I find it ha...Pretty. But why such little pictures? I find it harder to make them a single image, when so much of my field of vision is becoming a double image. <br /><br />With yours I managed it by enlarging them a lot. Then, of course, they were blurry.Allen Knutsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15616422252030334511noreply@blogger.com