tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post1420807456331970040..comments2024-02-15T04:42:41.606+00:00Comments on James' Empty Blog: Climate sensitivity is 5.3C?James Annanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-34144878903630031792016-04-08T19:50:50.009+01:002016-04-08T19:50:50.009+01:00Great resource, thanks!
Seems that the paper is e...Great resource, thanks!<br /><br />Seems that the paper is even worse than I had thought possible. It's just a perturbed parameter ensemble on CAM (atmosphere only!) and the 5 and 5.3C values are the two "best" simulations according to their particular metric on cloud water. <br /><br />If they believe these models are really better overall than the control, hopefully they'll do the full raft of CMIP simulations so their performance can be robustly evaluated. I'm not holding my breath.James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-33622766471041241022016-04-08T18:03:49.696+01:002016-04-08T18:03:49.696+01:00
paywalled?
https://sci-hub.io/
is your friend<br />paywalled?<br /><br />https://sci-hub.io/<br /><br />is your friendstevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06920897530071011399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-39836192705557732402016-04-08T15:45:05.101+01:002016-04-08T15:45:05.101+01:00UPI especially screws up (at least I hope it was U...UPI especially screws up (at least I hope it was UPI and not the original press release) saying the paper is published in Nature, and providing a clickable "Nature" link that goes to Science instead.<br />http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2016/04/07/New-cloud-study-offers-dire-global-warming-outlook/4301460057349/<br /><br />-----<br />In a new study published <a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6282/224" rel="nofollow">in the journal Nature</a>, researchers ...<br />-----Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-49980628195318685662016-04-08T02:22:53.130+01:002016-04-08T02:22:53.130+01:00So Hansen et al 1988 was right after all:)So Hansen et al 1988 was right after all:)EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-82434275709982325952016-04-07T23:54:39.139+01:002016-04-07T23:54:39.139+01:00Most annoying sentence from the paper's conclu...Most annoying sentence from the paper's conclusion (IMO): "Should the low-SLF bias be eliminated in GCMs, the most likely range of ECS should shift to higher values."Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16867691959969270844noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-91631581538339908562016-04-07T22:02:44.217+01:002016-04-07T22:02:44.217+01:00Gavin's been having a bit of a Twitter rant ab...Gavin's been having a bit of a Twitter rant about it. The <a href="http://news.yale.edu/2016/04/07/climate-models-have-underestimated-earth-s-sensitivity-co2-changes-study-finds" rel="nofollow">press release</a> seems a model example of how not to promote your paper. I agree that 5.3C for ECS seems bizarrely high and very hard to reconcile with all the other information.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com