tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post114698443520398545..comments2024-02-15T04:42:41.606+00:00Comments on James' Empty Blog: "Leak" of IPCC AR4James Annanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-17125594724419538262009-10-07T19:48:20.651+01:002009-10-07T19:48:20.651+01:00Oh, this will do:
http://hcl.harvard.edu/collectio...Oh, this will do:<br />http://hcl.harvard.edu/collections/ipcc/Hank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-83703706995437295292009-10-07T19:23:08.457+01:002009-10-07T19:23:08.457+01:00Here's the TAR; anyone seen a comparable list ...Here's the TAR; anyone seen a comparable list for the FAR?<br /><br />http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/559.htmHank Robertshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07521410755553979665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147219274626267062006-05-10T01:01:00.000+01:002006-05-10T01:01:00.000+01:00Basically, the one thing I would do if I was the I...Basically, the one thing I would do if I was the IPCC is refuse any comments (directly submitted or not) from anyone who broke the embargo. That means you Vincent Gray.EliRabetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07957002964638398767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147105671218212692006-05-08T17:27:00.000+01:002006-05-08T17:27:00.000+01:00It is a truly bizzare story...my take on it is on ...It is a truly bizzare story...my take on it is on my blog.Calvin Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00899904249648707318noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147097701210574572006-05-08T15:15:00.000+01:002006-05-08T15:15:00.000+01:00Couldn't argue with either of those two points, ev...Couldn't argue with either of those two points, even if I wanted to. :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147086013411313432006-05-08T12:00:00.000+01:002006-05-08T12:00:00.000+01:00Fairynuff - but it's my blog and I'll tease who I ...Fairynuff - but it's my blog and I'll tease who I want to :-)<BR/><BR/>The other linked comments are rather more outraged than Belette was.James Annanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04318741813895533700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147084755592060982006-05-08T11:39:00.000+01:002006-05-08T11:39:00.000+01:00With regards to Belette being a "usual suspect" th...With regards to Belette being a "usual suspect" there does seem to be a distinct closeness between this post and his. Both merely describe the release as "naughty" and this paragraph (the one referred to by Belette above) could *almost* be a summary:<BR/><BR/>"But having said the US is wrong, what would happen if it was simply publically released? Even the IPCC distribution system wasn't strongly controlled - I'm fairly sure all the septics got a copy - so why the need for restriction? It doesn't matter much who you allow to read it, as long as you don't have to bother reading comments from all the wackos."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9959776.post-1147029112937557172006-05-07T20:11:00.000+01:002006-05-07T20:11:00.000+01:00Glad I'm a suspect.Comment spam - good point - yes...Glad I'm a suspect.<BR/><BR/>Comment spam - good point - yes the IPCC won't have to filter it. Hadn't thought of that. To defend myself, I'll point out that I was (when talking about comments) discussing what would happen if the IPCC themselves had publically released it.William M. Connolleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05836299130680534926noreply@blogger.com